Sun 15 December 2019:
A new legislation approved by the Indian parliament, granting citizenship rights to minorities from neighboring countries, has created a diplomatic row between India and Bangladesh.
Not only two Bangladeshi ministers canceled their scheduled visit to India, minority communities in Bangladesh such as Hindus and Buddhists have also rejected the Indian legislation and reference made in the Indian parliament about their persecution.
Referring to harassment of minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan, India amended its citizenship law by giving citizenship rights to Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Parsis and Jains migrating from these countries.
Speaking in the parliament, Indian Home Minister Amit Shah stated that the persecution of Hindus has not stopped in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan, which has called for bringing the Citizenship Amendment Bill.
Bangladesh Foreign Minister Abdul Momen termed the accusation as false. He described the new Indian law as contradictory to the country’s historic secular values. He earlier canceled his scheduled India visit last week.
Home Minister Assaduzzaman Khan Kamal said, while adopting or amending legislation was India’s internal matter, allegations about the torturing of minorities in our country are “totally baseless and false”.
He described speeches made in the Indian parliament regarding the oppression of minorities in Bangladesh as “nonsense”. He claimed that there was no report of any communal tension in Bangladesh over the past 11 years.
Minorities speak
Talking to Anadolu Agency, noted film actor and convener of Sampriti Bangladesh (Harmonious Bangladesh), Pijush Bandyopadhyay, said Hindus in the country were living in utmost communal harmony.
“Just look at [Muslim religious festivals] Eid-ul-Fitr, Eid-ul-Azha and [Hindu] Sharodio Durga puja and Christmas Day [in Bangladesh], you see spontaneous participation of all people regardless of ethnic and communal identity,” he added.
He said Bangladesh has a history of living with amity and communal harmony. “Any isolated incident from any part of the country cannot be construed as overall harassment,” he said.
Praising religious harmony under the leadership of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, leader of the Buddhist community Dilip Barua said his community does not face any persecution, as alleged by various Indian lawmakers, while defending the controversial legislation.
“This allegation of India amounted to challenging the spirit of Bangladesh’s liberation war,” he said.
He accused India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of conspiring to turn their country into a Hindu nationalist state. He said due to Indian actions, communal harmony in Bangladesh may also come under stress.
“But through the spirit of real democracy, we will overcome this challenge,” Barua added.
Reaction of political leaders
The main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party’s joint secretary general Syed Moazzem Hossain Alal accused India of engineering ethnic cleansing.
“The world knows very well about the deadly communal riots in India in the state of Gujarat in 2002. The current ruling Hindu nationalist BJP is an offshoot of ultra-Hindu nationalist organization, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh which has been responsible for anti-Muslim riots in India,” he said.
“In our country, there is no record of communal tension under state patronization. People are peacefully living here for many generations,” he added.
He said in the northeastern state of Assam, an exercise to detect illegal immigrants have kept 1.9 million people out of the citizenship list.
“Irony is that relatives of even India’s former President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed have been kept out of the citizenship list,” he said.
Terming the religious harmony in Bangladesh far better than in India, Shafiqur Rahman, head of the country’s largest Islamic political party Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, said his country does not discriminate between majority or minority.
“We believe that all are the citizens of Bangladesh and deserve equal human rights,” he said.
He termed the Indian amendment to the citizenship law as “totally discriminatory”.
-AA
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!