DELHI RIOTS “DIDN’T TAKE PLACE IN SPUR OF THE MOMENT, PRE-PLANNED”: COURT

Asia World

Tue 28 September 2021:

The Delhi riots of 2020 were planned and calculated to cause disruptions and were not triggered by any incident, the High Court said while refusing bail to one of the accused in the case on Monday.

“The February 2020 riots were a conspiracy, planned and executed. They evidently did not take place in a spur of the moment,” the Delhi High Court said in strong remarks on the three-day violence that left over 50 dead and 200 injured.

DELHI RIOTS WERE PRE-PLANNED SAYS JAMIAT PRESIDENT MAULANA ARSHAD MADANI

The court said in the video footage submitted by the prosecution, it was clear from the conduct of the protesters that the riots were a planned attempt to disrupt normal life and the functioning of the government.

RULE OF LAW DETERIORATING IN INDIA- EU CALLS FOR PROBE INTO POLICE ROLE IN DELHI RIOTS

“The systematic disconnection and destruction of the CCTV cameras also confirms the existence of a pre-planned and pre-meditated conspiracy to disturb law and order in the city,” said Justice Subramonium Prasad.“This is also evident from the fact that innumerable rioters ruthlessly descended with sticks, dandas, bats etc. upon a hopelessly outnumbered cohort of police officials.”

Justice Prasad made the comments while denying the bail request of an accused, Mohammad Ibrahim, who was arrested in December. Another accused, Mohammad Saleem Khan, was granted bail.

“O, ALLAH, WHY DIDN’T YOU MAKE ME A HINDU?”: DELHI GENOCIDE VICTIM SAYS

“Individual liberty” cannot be used to threaten the fabric of civilised society, the High Court said, adding that Ibrahim was seen on CCTV clips threatening the crowds with a sword.

Ibrahim has been linked to the killing of Head Constable Ratan Lal on February 24 by a mob of protesters. His lawyer had argued that Ratan Lal’s death was not caused by a sword.

Ibrahim also claimed that he was carrying the sword only to protect himself and his family.

MUSLIM ABANDONED…BEWILDERED…STUNNED AFTER DELHI GENOCIDE

The court rejected his arguments, saying the “clinching evidence that tilts the court towards extending Ibrahim’s custody” is the weapon he was carrying, which could have inflicted serious injuries and even killed.

The case involves a mob attack on policemen at Chand Bagh in northeast Delhi at the peak of the riots revolving around protests over a new citizenship law. Ratan Lal, who was a part of the grossly outnumbered contingent of policemen, died of head injuries and another official was severely injured.

-NDTV

_____________________________________________________________________________

FOLLOW INDEPENDENT PRESS:

TWITTER (CLICK HERE)
https://twitter.com/IpIndependent

FACEBOOK (CLICK HERE)
https://web.facebook.com/ipindependent

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *